Prediction of Gabriela Ce [470th] vs Anouk Koevermans [182nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W W L W W L
Form
L W W W L W L W L LHead To Head: Ce 1 - 0 Koevermans
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ce winning 2 and Koevermans winning 1. The last match between Ce and Koevermans was at the W75 Vacaria, 27-03-2025, Second, Clay with Gabriela Ce getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gabriela Ce | 1 |
| Anouk Koevermans | 0 |
| Ce | Stats | Koevermans |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (5-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 47% (8-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 470 | Ranking | 182 |
| 221 | Highest Rank | 179 |
| 32 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 14 | Titles | 2 |
| 56% (458-361) | Career Total W/L | 61% (153-98) |
| $26,182 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Ce VS Koevermans H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
||||
Ce VS Koevermans H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 20 | Games Won | 18 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 3:59:53 | Average Match Time | 3:59:53 |
| 75% (98/131) | 1st Serve % | 72% (96/134) |
| 59% (58/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (62/96) |
| 58% (19/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 43% (57/134) | Return Points Win % | 41% (54/131) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gabriela Ce vs Anouk Koevermans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ce 1 - 0 Koevermans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ce has won 37.69% of points on their second serve, while Koevermans has won 41.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ce, in recent form, has won 43.2% of their opponent's second serve points, while Koevermans has won 48.81%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.3% and 28.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ce has saved 53.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Koevermans has saved 56.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ce has won 61.67% of matches played (W/L 37/ 23), with Koevermans winning 64.47% (W/L 49/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 386/ 275), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Koevermans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Ce has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23), where as Koevermans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.22% of matches (W/L 49/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ce winning 1 times and Koevermans being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ce winning 2 and Koevermans winning 1. The last match between Ce and Koevermans was at the W75 Vacaria, 27-03-2025, Second, Clay with Gabriela Ce getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:59:53.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ce and Koevermans have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ce winning 1 times and Koevermans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Ce winning 1, and Koevermans 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ce has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.68 while Koevermans has played against players with an average rank of 245.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ce has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Koevermans has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ce has converted 46.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Koevermans has converted 40.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Gabriela Ce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ania Hertel
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Gabriela Ce
55%
(
11 of
20)
1st Serve %
66%
(
19 of
29)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
55%
(
6 of
11)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
32
Total Points Won
17
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Fernanda Labrana
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
65
Total Points Won
67
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Gabriela Ce
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Golovina
Player
Gabriela Ce
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Gabric
Player
Gabriela Ce
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Anouk Koevermans
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Anouk Koevermans
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Karina Miller
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Ella Seidel
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Anouk Koevermans
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Ce vs Koevermans?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ce Vs Koevermans is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (458/361) | Win/Loss | 61% (153/98) |
| 55% (1013/841) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (339/234) |
| 53% (8781/7868) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2856/2438) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 256 | Aces Total | 350 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.53 |
| 1727 | Total Double Faults | 1364 |
| 1:8:15 | Average Match Time | 1:33:28 |
| 231.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 251.76 |
| 69% (22900/33304) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9013/14691) |
| 58% (13223/22900) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5580/9013) |
| 44% (4568/10404) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (2257/5678) |
| 50% (2176/4368) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1063/2099) |
| 47% (15747/33168) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7282/14811) |
| 55% (446/804) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (152/250) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (93/172) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (29/52) |
| 52% (119/229) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (38/72) |
| 86% (455/393) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (156/135) |
| 14% (455/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (156/21) |
| 17% (362/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (95/18) |
See recent tennis photos of Ce and Koevermans
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
